utline-none [--shadow-height:45px] has-data-writing-block:pointer-events-none has-data-writing-block:-mt-(--shadow-height) has-data-writing-block:pt-(--shadow-height) [&:has([data-writing-block])>*]:pointer-events-auto [content-visibility:auto] supports-[content-visibility:auto]:[contain-intrinsic-size:auto_100lvh] scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" tabindex="-1" dir="auto" data-turn-id="request-WEB:7204cfd7-ccf4-4e29-8510-83be9b87f034-0" data-testid="conversation-turn-2" data-scroll-anchor="true" data-turn="assistant">
utline-hidden relative flex w-full min-w-0 flex-col agent-turn" tabindex="-1" bis_skin_checked="1">
I think your comparison to the door-in-the-face strategy really makes sense. When the focus stays on the 3%, people might miss the bigger structural changes that affect promotions long term. It reminds me of playing agario — you think the small blobs are the issue, then suddenly a giant cell swallows you from nowhere. The real impact isn’t always what’s most visible at first glance.
